Top arXiv papers from Week 15, 2020

This week’s entry focuses on observational tests of a specific class of string inflationary models (from which one can set limits on fundamental microscopic string parameters), observational tests of naked singularity spacetimes from their shadows and the continuum spectrum emitted from accretion disks, and finally a study addressing the interesting question of what was the maximum initial temperature of the Universe in the radiation domination epoch. Happy Easter to those readers who celebrate it!

#1 2004.01210: Fitting string inflation to real cosmological data by Michele Cicoli and Eleonora Di Valentino

One often hears that string theory is experimentally untestable as its predictions play a relevant role only on energy scales which are presently (and possibly forever) inaccessible. However, this is not exactly true, if anything because string theory is not a model in itself, but a framework (much as QFT): as the opening paragraph of Cicoli and Di Valentino’s paper clarifies, it therefore makes more sense to talk about testing particular models built following the rules of string theory. If one tries to build 4D string models which can play a relevant role in cosmology, one often finds that the UV consistency of the theory implies correlations between various theoretical and phenomenological features of the model (this is not too far, for example, from the whole swampland program idea, which aims to define a set of “low-energy rules” which need to be satisfied for the theory to be consistent with a sensible UV completion), which might have important observational implications. One might then hope to be able to use cosmological observations to rule out large portions of the string landscape. All of this was very abstract so far, but can it be done in practice? In this week’s paper, Cicoli and Di Valentino concretely study a well-motivated and well-understood class of string inflationary models known as fibre inflation (FI), built out of type IIB Large Volume Scenarios. FI models have been studied in great detail in recent years, ranging from how the inflationary potential is generated, to how to embed them consistently within Calabi-Yau orientifolds, to the dynamics of (p)reheating (Cicoli and his PhD advisor Fernando Quevedo played a key role in many of these studies).

In the first part of the work, Cicoli and Di Valentino review the observational predictions of FI, which among the others include a small amount of extra (dark) radiation due to the inflaton decay into hidden light degrees of freedom. They then constrain the model against state-of-the-art cosmological observations, focusing on a specific mapping of the parameter space in terms of three semi-phenomenological parameters (called gamma, R, and V0, the first one related to the inflaton decay branching ratios, and the latter two to the inflaton potential) which they trade for the usual cosmological As, ns, and Neff (now derived parameters). Two results stand out in my opinion. The first is that, through this analysis, Cicoli and Di Valentino derive rather clear-cut predictions for the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio ns and r. In particular, r is found to be approximately 0.007, which is within reach of next-generation experiments (CMB-S4 aims for a precision on r of about 0.001), whereas the observationally favored class of FI models leads to a small amount of dark radiation (delta Neff<0.1). The second important result is that, from these constraints and exploiting other considerations, Cicoli and Di Valentino manage to set constraints on two microscopic string parameters: the string coupling gs, and the Calabi-Yau extra-dimensional volume V. I found this last finding, and the whole paper in general, very exciting! One of my key research interests in recent years (as you can see from my Research page), particularly with my colleague Luca Visinelli, has been “Observational tests of string theory” from either cosmology or astrophysics, possibly aiming to set limits on fundamental string parameters (for instance with Luca we tried to set limits on the fundamental parameters of the string axiverse in 1809.06382 and on the scale at which string-inspired quantum gravity effects come into play in black holes, possibly to help address the black hole information paradox, in 1904.12983). It is for me really exciting to see other people take this, in my opinion promising, line of research seriously, and to see multi-disciplinary collaborations come out of it (Cicoli is a string theorist, and Di Valentino an observational cosmologist).

#2 2004.02840: Imprints of the Janis-Newman-Winicour spacetime on observations related to shadow and accretion by Subhadip Sau et al.

Understanding the final fate of gravitational collapse of sufficiently massive stars is a key unsolved problem in General Relativity. While the cosmic censorship conjecture states that naked singularities (i.e. singularities not hidden behind an event horizon) are forbidden, and hence the final fate of gravitational collapse of sufficiently massive stars should be that of a compact object with an event horizon, such as black holes (BHs), this remains a conjecture. It is therefore important to study the possibility that well-motivated naked singularities (NSs) spacetimes might exist and, importantly, may be observationally distinguished from BHs. One well-motivated NS spacetime is the so-called Janis-Newman-Winicour (JNW) spacetime, which is an exact solution of the equations of General Relativity coupled to a massless scalar field. This solution features an additional scalar charge which continuously maps the JNW spacetime to the Schwarzschild one (with a slight abuse of notation, since the JNW spacetime is not a BH in the strict sense, one could say it carries primary hair). How to observationally distinguish a JNW spacetime from a Schwarzschild BH?

In this week’s paper, Sau et al. study two important observational signatures which might allow one to make such a distinction. The first is the obvious shadow. For a BH, the shadow is the apparent (i.e. gravitationally lensed) image of the photon sphere (the region of space-time where gravity is so strong that photons travel in unstable, not necessarily circular, orbits). In other words, the BH shadow is the closed curve on the sky separating capture from scattering orbits. Therefore, contrary to the sometimes wrong image given by popular media, the shadow is not directly related to the event horizon. All that is needed to produce a shadow is a photon sphere, which can exist even in the absence of an event horizon. Sau et al. study the effect of the JNW scalar charge on its shadow, showing that increasing the scalar charge decreases the size of the resulting shadow (at the same time counterintuitively increasing the radius of the photon sphere). Sau et al. then study the continuum spectrum emitted by accretion disks surrounding the JNW spacetime, finding that the high-frequency tail of the spectrum is rather strongly affected by the scalar charge. They then confront their theoretical findings against observational probes, such as the size of M87*’s shadow as detected by the Event Horizon Telescope, as well as the observed optical luminosities of a sample of quasars. The latter seems to provide hints towards the JNW spacetime being favored over the Schwarzschild one, but in my opinion this result should not be taken at face value: it likely reflects incomplete modelling of the spectral energy distribution of the quasars, which is very challenging, rather than a proper observational indication of a naked singularity. Overall, this was a very interesting paper which will certainly be useful in the years to come when the possibility of precision tests of gravity and the nature of space-time in the strong-field regime will become a reality.

#3 2004.02895: An Upper Limit on the Initial Temperature of the Radiation-Dominated Universe by Betty Hu and Avi Loeb

Prior to the current dark energy-dominated phase of the Universe’s expansion history, the Universe was matter-dominated, and before that radiation-dominated. The radiation domination epoch extends as least as far back as Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN), at a temperature of about 1 MeV, a few minutes after the Big Bang, but presumably even way before that. What came before the radiation-domination epoch is unclear (an early matter domination epoch? inflation? a bounce? something else altogether?) and is something we might never know. However, a related and well-motivated question one might ask is: what was the maximum initial temperature of the Universe during the radiation domination phase? In other words, how far back can the radiation-domination epoch in principle extend to? This is the question Hu and Loeb try to address in this week’s paper.

Electromagnetic scattering of charged particles, leading to bremsstrahlung radiation also known as free-free emission, is a well-known and well-studied process. Less studied is gravitational bremsstrahlung, resulting in radiation emission following gravitational scattering of particles. One of the most recent papers studying gravitational bremsstrahlung is 1409.4555 by Gruzinov and Veneziano. In this week’s paper, Hu and Loeb note that, if one conservatively ignores all other sources of stochastic gravitational waves (GWs), then the GW radiation produced from gravitational bremsstrahlung is subject to the usual upper limits on any exotic form of radiation, such as limits from BBN. The key observation is that the amount of GW radiation produced from gravitational bremsstrahlung depends rather sensitively on both the number of particles present when the radiation was generated N (making the simplifying but probably justified assumption that all particles contribute in the same way to the amount of GW radiation), and the maximum initial temperature of the Universe during the radiation domination phase Tmax. Using these limits, Hu and Loeb estimate that for Tmax of about 10^19 GeV, hence around the Planck scale, the number of particles N can be at most the number of particles we already know of in the Standard Model. Therefore, this sets a rather model-independent limit on Tmax of 10^19 GeV. Overall, this was a short, light, and interesting read!