This week’s entry covers possible trouble for ΛCDM from merging clusters, a new state-of-the-art calculation of the effective number of neutrinos Neff, and a 5% test of spatial variations of Newton’s constant from the Large Magellanic Cloud. Enjoy the read!
#1 2012.03950: A massive blow for ΛCDM - the high redshift, mass, and collision velocity of the interacting galaxy cluster El Gordo contradicts concordance cosmology by Elena Asencio, Indranil Banik, and Pavel Kroupa
1E 0657-56 and ACT-CL J0102-4915 (or SPT-CL J0102-4915), respectively the Bullet Cluster and El Gordo (literally, “the fat one” in Spanish) for friends, are two rather extreme examples of colliding galaxy clusters, with the former best known for allegedly supporting the existence of collisionless dark matter (DM). These clusters are rather extreme for different reasons: the two clusters merging in the Bullet Cluster have extremely high relative velocity, while El Gordo is the most massive distant cluster. Various earlier works have argued that these two clusters might be be a problem for the usual hierarchical structure formation paradigm within ΛCDM (i.e. smaller objects forming first, before merging into larger ones), as they pose the question of how could objects so massive and with so high relative velocity form so early within ΛCDM. The answer might be that structure formation proceeded top-down rather than bottom-up (hierarchically), as might occur for instance within certain classes of DM models, where structure formation is suppressed below some scale.
In this week’s paper, Asencio and collaborators focus on other oddities of El Gordo other than its mass and redshift: its infall velocity, which they estimate is much larger than its escape velocity. Could it have been that a third object was pushing the two towards each other (making the system even more odd)? The authors argue that the combination of mass, redshift, and infall velocity make El Gordo a much more peculiar object than the Bullet Cluster. Using a variety of appositely constructed metrics, they find that the tension between Bullet Cluster+El Gordo observations and the ΛCDM model is somewhere between 5σ and >6.5σ depending on whether one accounts for finite sky fraction, poor fit to El Gordo’s twin-tail morphology, discrepancy between assumed mass and weak lensing observables, unlikely small impact parameter, and so forth. I’m not an expert on these topics so I cannot judge whether these results are correct, but they are certainly intriguing. The authors then go on to argue that a scenario which could naturally reconcile these observations envisages a combination of MOND plus a 11 eV hot DM component in the form of a sterile neutrino. While again I’m not expert, I’m also honestly not sure how well this scenario would manage to explain, at the very least, 1) the measured galaxy power spectra from a number of different surveys, and 2) the hard to dispute existence of DM as seen in the Bullet Cluster. I’m quite sure this paper will make popular science magazines headlines in the next weeks, so it will be interesting to see what will come out of the subsequent discussion.
#2 2012.02726: Towards a precision calculation of Neff in the Standard Model II: Neutrino decoupling in the presence of flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED by Jack Bennett et al.
The effective number of relativistic species Neff is a very important quantity for, among the other fields, particle physics and cosmology. Any deviation from the canonical expectation Neff~3 (for the 3 Standard Model neutrinos) could very well be the sign of new (light) physics, and it is therefore very important to establish what exactly is the expected value of Neff within the Standard Model. The very well-known baseline value of Neff=3.046 was computed by the “Neapolitan” group of Mangano et al. (a group which is undoubtedly the world leader in these types of calculations, and the related field of BBN) in the now seminal reference hep-ph/0506164. The reason Neff is slightly larger than 3 is due to well-known effects such as neutrino decoupling being non-instantaneous, which in itself leads to non-thermal flavour-dependent distortions to the neutrino spectra.
This reference value of 3.046 has remained untouched for several years, before being revised by Pablo de Salas and Sergio Pastor (the latter also in the original Mangano et al. paper) to 3.045 in 1606.06986, which accounted for neutrino flavour oscillations and finite-temperature QED corrections. Later still, the “Valencian” team of Gariazzo, de Salas, and Pastor, improved the theoretical calculations for the benchmark Neff value in the presence of flavour oscillations in 1905.11290. Finally, the “Sydneian” team of Bennett et al. quantified the leading and several sub-leading finite-temperature QED contributions to Neff, which led to the revised value of 3.044 in 1911.04504. The most logical next step would have been for the Valencian and Sydneian teams to join forces and account for all these improvements at the same time to provide a new even more precise benchmark value for Neff, which should hopefully remain the standard for years to come.
The result is this week’s paper. The short take-away message is that Neff=3.0433±0.0002, where the theoretical uncertainty is due to numerical convergence and uncertainties in the solar mixing angle. The main improvements with respect to the past are:
-precise calculation of the energy transport in the presence of flavour oscillations;
-two new subdominant finite-temperature corrections to the QED equation of state, including notably one to order O(e^3);
-a complete numerical evaluation of the neutrino-neutrino collision integral in the presence of flavour oscillations, including the flavour-off-diagonal entries;
-detailed assessment of the theoretical uncertainty, quoted in the final results.
The difference with respect to the widely quoted 3.046 is still small, and in particular beyond the reach of future probes such as CMB-S4, which expect to reach a sensitivity to Neff of ~0.03 or, in the most optimistic case, 0.02 (see 1610.02743). Nonetheless, it is important to have a precise assessment of what the benchmark value of Neff in the Standard Model is. Given the calibre and reputation of the authors of this paper with regards to these types of calculations, I guess this 3.043 value might become the standard in the next years and slowly replace the famous 3.046.
#3 2012.05028: A 5% measurement of the gravitational constant in the Large Magellanic Cloud by Harry Desmond, Jeremy Sakstein, and Bhuv Jain
This is a cool paper which tries to measure Newton’s gravitational constant G in a nearby system, the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). While tests of General Relativity and of the constancy of fundamental constants have mostly focused on the time-variation thereof, it is also important to test their spatial variation by going and measuring these constants in our neighborhood, i.e. the local Universe. The LMC contains six well-studied Cepheid variable stars in detached eclipsing binaries. One can obtain a complete orbital solution using radial velocity and photometric observations, while stellar modelling is achieved by precise measurements of the Cepheids’ periods - these measurements are sensitive to G through Kepler’s law and the gravitational free-fall time respectively.
Desmond and collaborators devise a method allowing them to jointly infer G and the stellar parameters. Doing so they measure the ratio of G in the LMC to G in the Solar System (SS) to be G_LMC/G_SS = 0.93^+0.05_-0.04. This 5% measurement of G is consistent with G being the same in both the LMC and the SS to about 1.5σ. Given the potential systematic uncertainties involved (such as atmosphere modelling, metallicity dependence, and so on), a 1.5σ consistency is an excellent result and the central value <1 should be no cause of concern or claims that G varies with space. Finally, it is interesting that this test can potentially constrain theories of dark energy or modified gravity which, by violating the equivalence principle, make the strength of gravity spatially varying. Generally within these theories, if some screening mechanism is invoked, the strength of gravity would increase within lower-density regions such as the LMC. The central value of G_LMC/G_SS<1 would therefore appear to disfavor these theories, which include f(R) or DGP gravity and would generally predict up to a 1/3 increase in the strength of gravity in unscreened regions (though being the LMC within the Milky Way halo, it cannot be completely unscreened and therefore the increase in G should be less than 1/3). Overall, this was a very cool paper, whose method will become even more useful with future more precise data, and which gets a further thumbs up from my side thanks to the associated publicly available code!